Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 42

Thread: jodi

  1. #1

    jodi

    does anybody from here consider jodi as the best net art website?????
    im in love of this

    http://www.jodi.org/

    another parts of the site i found or website from the same authour

    http://map.jodi.org/
    http://404.jodi.org/
    http://oss.jodi.org/
    http://sod.jodi.org/
    http://asdfg.jodi.org/
    http://text.jodi.org/
    http://jetsetwilly.jodi.org/
    http://www.wrongbrowser.com/
    http://www.untitled-game.org/
    http://maxpaynecheatsonly.jodi.org/

    and this is a critic that jodi is making about blogs:

    http://blogroll.jodi.org/index.html
    ┐ymra esohw dna uoy

  2. #2
    um, i opened the first 3 links. there's alot of ugly going on there.

  3. #3
    I really like this, but I really like that 80's computer graphic style anyway (is there a name for it), I would say this is an acquired taste, I can imagine lots of people hating on this.

    http://jetsetwilly.jodi.org/ this just brings back so many memories of my youth.

  4. #4
    yea, these peeps aren't winning any awards.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by haam View Post
    yea, these peeps aren't winning any awards.
    awards matters?
    if you look for jodi influence on net art, you would we surprise, im sure of that.
    jodi is for me the most important net art artist in history
    ┐ymra esohw dna uoy

  6. #6
    i was generalizing my opinion on the bad art on that site. you have your opinion and i have mine. i just don't agree that a bunch of sites with mediocre graphics or reused historical graphics are going to place a mark on art history. some of this crap even has bad resolution and websave quality.

    "most important" - yea, these crap graphics are way more important than anything people like joshua davis (praystation.com) or james patterson (presstube.com) have done for digital graphics or flash. psh....

    there are tons of better artists on the net and in the real world.
    Last edited by haam; October 25th, 2006 at 04:00 PM.

  7. #7
    you know i've been refraining from moving most of the bad sites being posted in kool sites... but this one takes the cake... it's unrivaled in absolute atrocity.
    Let us live so that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry. - Mark Twain
    Don't PM me your CSS, xHTML, JS or PHP questions. I will not reply to ANY IE6 questions.

  8. #8
    the problem here is that we are used to be on sites with cool and smooth graphics. where everything has to be cute and nice, nice tipography, nice colors, nice interface. and jodi is laughing about all that. this artist creates net art based con concepts and idea, not colors or imterfaces.
    i respect all designers who works with interfaces, but i rather, designers that work on concepts, ideas, abstraction, and show another face of web. they work as "artist", just like artist from the 60/70/80 or 90s (like happenings, performancem, abstract, minimal, povera, situasionism art). and they are showing, that graphic and web design can be considered as an art under the idea of "net art".
    i really cant belive what they do with this post. just because someone take it out from "kool sites" coss they dont consider it cool. does flash make it cool? smooth graphics make it cool?. im really disapointed.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jodi
    Last edited by pablosci; October 25th, 2006 at 08:49 PM.
    ┐ymra esohw dna uoy

  9. #9

    I think you should visit my site.

  10. #10
    A website isn't kool because of how deep it may be or symbolic. It's about initial impression.

    I'll give you this, when someone visits a certain site... they've got two choices, leave or stay. After browsing the content, they also have the ability to leave forever.

    They don't just think, "I'm never visiting this site again." There's a pyschological aspect to content delivery that draws people away from such sites. The mere lack of usablity and the fact that I couldn't even see the whole page on my monitor... far from tell what it is, made me leave on instant. I went back to see what you were talking about, still didn't see it... I left.

    edit:/ I understand the artist's way of thinking.. however if you don't present it in a pleasing fashion, no one wants to see it. Regardless of how meaningful it is. As much as I like the structure of a hydrogen bomb..
    Last edited by hl; October 25th, 2006 at 09:04 PM.
    got pwnt?

  11. #11
    Shame on the people who pass judgement on this work without researching it first.

    "most important" - yea, these crap graphics are way more important than anything people like joshua davis (praystation.com) or james patterson (presstube.com) have done for digital graphics or flash. psh....
    Haam your an idiot, FYI they did win awards for this, and simply calling it crap without knowing what your talking about (the subject in this instance) is out of order.

    pseudo elitism rocks
    Last edited by ramie; October 26th, 2006 at 05:22 AM.

  12. #12
    Alright, before I pass judgement, could someone explain what it actually is? Some amazing feat of programming genius that I fail to see?

    I think you should visit my site.

  13. #13
    Simply put it's just some art using the web as one of their mediums to present it, they also do things like modify video games, video exhibitions, all types of interesting digital artwork. The 2 artists in question are internationally renowned for their work and have been doing this for a long time, longer than say Joshua 'Ego' Davis, while their work may be an accuried taste and not as pleasing to the eye, its just as - if not more - relevant.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jodi
    http://digitalarts.lcc.gatech.edu/un...nt_a_jodi.html
    http://beallcenter.uci.edu/shift/bios/paesmans.html

    http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=Joa...utf-8&oe=utf-8
    http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en...G=Search&meta=
    Last edited by ramie; October 26th, 2006 at 07:46 AM.

  14. #14
    358
    posts
    Under Investigation
    asdfg.jodi almost gave me a seisure
    You are not your system specs. You are not your banners. You are not your uptime stats. You are not your downloads size. You are not your post count.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by ramie View Post
    Shame on the people who pass judgement on this work without researching it first.

    Haam your an idiot, FYI they did win awards for this, and simply calling it crap without knowing what your talking about (the subject in this instance) is out of order.

    pseudo elitism rocks
    hey ramie, suck my ****. the artwork on that website is ****ing terrible and i don't care what the background of it is. you can't just take a poop on a keyboard and mouse and expect everyone to like it.

    there is a difference between good art and bad. it has nothing to do with being cute or smooth. if something isn't pleasing to the eye it just isn't.

    just let people have differed opinions, what are you the next adolf hitler?

    actung actung, no personal taste in artwork, zis iz zee best webArrrt ever made and you must love eeet.

    jerkoff.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Home About kirupa.com Meet the Moderators Advertise

 Link to Us

 Credits

Copyright 1999 - 2012