next set of iZac logos

[zacus]

heres some more logos with hopefully everything solved from the last set

( http://www.kirupaforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74792 )

how do you guys feel about these?

http://www.geocities.com/waqkum/logo02forcritique.jpg

[Yeldarb]

looks familiar and the iBlah is done too much (macesque). I liked the last onese better.

[Beddoes]

I like Logo 2 the best but ur older ones were also better keep on trying :D

[simplistik]

I like your first set better, 1 or 3 from first set. Besides these aren't blurry so they don't look as good anyway (yea that was sarcasm)

[Voetsjoeba]

I'd go with the flame alone.

[bet444]

This is better...I agree with Voetsjoeba. But you know what? Try to use the flame as the point for "i"...
I hope you`ll not use those colors in the final version...

[zacus]

hmm thanks guys, i think i might go with the third logo of the first set for headings and that sort of thing, and the first logo of the first set for things where i just need a logo...

do you agree?

[tonygarcia]

looks familiar and the iBlah is done too much

true, true...

[echo19]

Hey zacus,
I like this set better, simplify it a little bit more though. Maybe just one arrow/pointer(?) and the name all on one line. Try to position the elements in an organized way, icon first, then type, or vice-versa. Stacked is cool too, but your eye should see one thing first. I still dig the comet with the nintey-degree angle element. Is it a pointer? Maybe since iZac is the name of your company and 'design' is the descriptor/service, emphasis might look better soley on iZac with 'design' smaller in all caps. Decide what you want the eye to see first, the graphic or the type then follow it left to right, up or down.

still cool though.

[dreeft]

I like logo 1, but the iZac isn't necessary.

[sirtimbly]

echo19 has the best comment here.

less is more.

logo 2 is the closest so far.