View Full Version : need Comments
ruski_flasher
August 3rd, 2004, 02:06 PM
http://storage.msn.com/s1pZ8pl_R1n1zHC28UunNI-HNmo7qEgCCAuN1-1vP4pPY_EV68Njz2A67ATx3vZfZpKizY1MQPVipiSW3iohCgE_ Q/00.jpg
new photo :s:, taken same day as previous one. ttc dufferin subway station.
the picture needed to be color. and no manipulations in PS.
please crtisize on the content of the photo, not the resolution. :angel:
pixi
August 3rd, 2004, 02:09 PM
er..Whats the question?
sirtimbly
August 3rd, 2004, 02:10 PM
I wasn't aware that there was an ongoing photo battle, could you provide a link to the thread?
Looks nice, maybe needs little more depth or perspective...
pixi
August 3rd, 2004, 02:13 PM
er silly me . missed the question below the image.. yeah looks ok, dunno about the BG , or context of the setting but , nice light index on the bottle reflections
ruski_flasher
August 3rd, 2004, 02:13 PM
sorry, i just added the question. :)
nobody
August 3rd, 2004, 02:14 PM
The picture isn't doing anything for me. Boring lighting, Weird angle, uneasy cropping, lack of depth. Work on it a bit more.
Also congratulations on creating the title with the most useless characters in it!
ruski_flasher
August 3rd, 2004, 02:17 PM
congrats on 3001 posts! :)
its natural lighting, (sun)
i was going for a wierd angle, make it more trendwhore
i agree with cropping, it is a little wierd.
i dont know what you mean by lack of depth.
simplistik
August 3rd, 2004, 02:25 PM
LoL... hmm... yea quite boring IMO too.
Lack of depth means everything is in the same focal point. The lighting is definately lacking, regaurdless of if it's natural lighting or not. Quality of the image seems really low, not as crisp as what it should prolly be. This won't win you the battle.
sirtimbly
August 3rd, 2004, 02:26 PM
Depth of Field: the distance between the nearest and furthest objects in focus as seen by a camera lens, which varies with the focal length of the lens, its f-stop setting, and wavelength of light.
Therefore the angle of the photo you took does not convey any depth. It's simply a oddly askew image of part of a Jone's Soda bottle with some random color smears in the background. Perhaps there are some good trendy elements to it, yet it lacks the refined composition of image that is usually saught in photography.
ruski_flasher
August 3rd, 2004, 02:26 PM
its not crisp, becuase i lowered the quality to lower the size. [im using an MSN profile to host this]
ruski_flasher
August 3rd, 2004, 02:33 PM
who changed the name of this thread?
was it DJ?:scream: :m: :vamp:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.