PDA

View Full Version : ATI or nVidia



StylingPaT
October 8th, 2003, 10:29 AM
What do you think is better and why

asphaltcowboy
October 8th, 2003, 10:33 AM
I do like ATI, perhaps more than nVidia, but recent ATI's haven't had very good cooling systems: they get SO hot :( Another problem is that some companies don't develop for them (e.g. GTA3 doesn't work afaik). That's not their fault though :(

StylingPaT
October 8th, 2003, 10:35 AM
Yeah :-\ alot of companys are building their games around nVidia

Why cant you put more points into the poll? Did it close aready? lol. Its been 5 min

Digitalosophy
October 8th, 2003, 11:16 AM
i had both, nVidia seems to be much better

Niann
October 8th, 2003, 11:23 AM
I have both as well, I like my ATI much better. =) Although, I do have some games that get flakey on the ATI, and they play fine on the nVidia. :sigh:

Cheers!
-Niann

prstudio
October 8th, 2003, 11:28 AM
nvidia's technology appears to be way better, i havent had much experience with ATI, but the nvidia nforce on board graphics system is amazing...

i hear they are also thinking about jumping to making full processors in the near future

Marz
October 8th, 2003, 12:30 PM
Radeon 9700 PRO all the way... :)

λ
October 8th, 2003, 12:43 PM
I tend to prefer nVidia... I just generally get a feeling that their boards are more complete.

That said, if someone offered me a Radeon 9700 Pro, then I'd take it :beam: :thumb:

BadMagick
October 8th, 2003, 12:54 PM
I dunno... my nVidia card for my laptop is a piece of junk. I mean - it works ok, but the drivers I have for it are so unstable. I put in the updated drivers and it messed up my whole system. I had to revert to the old one that came with my machine's setup disk. Even then it was a little sketchy. I haven't had any problems in a long time, but then again, I haven't play games on it in a long time.

I haven't had an ATI, but from what I know from nVidia - doesn't make me like them much.

thoriphes
October 8th, 2003, 01:07 PM
:love:nVidia:love:

Never owned an ATI, always had an nVidia, never failed.

prstudio
October 8th, 2003, 01:17 PM
rofl i would like to have the ketchup box one, it makes the hot dogs look extra good!

I am the Noah
October 8th, 2003, 03:03 PM
mmm nividia for sure! but recently the FX cards don't work very well with DX9 unlike ATI. That sucks because i just got halo for pc and its a directX game and i have a FX5600. the new drivers for it make it run a 1000 times better, but it messes the fan up :(

Phat7
October 8th, 2003, 03:29 PM
My nVidia is pissing me off lately. I can't even view flash sites normally, the processor goes nuts! :a:

λ
October 8th, 2003, 04:09 PM
^^

That has probably nothing to do with your nVidia card... I mean, it might be, but Flash really only uses your processor... it only uses your graphics card for drawing 2D graphics, which pretty much any card can handle nowadays.

kirupa
October 8th, 2003, 04:17 PM
I'm all about performance, so my pick changes every few product cycles. Right now it is all about ATI - their graphics cards seem to be outperforming the latest nVidia processors. The 256 MB 9800 PRO series of cards seem pretty good for almost any....word processing and flash animation work :sure:

Yeldarb
October 8th, 2003, 04:32 PM
i've got a radeon 9700 Pro, and it is simply amazing. I downloaded the hacked catalyst 3.4's and now it's software overclocked to the speed of a 9800 :)
the only thing that i've seen a less than expected perfomance on is dock speed, i've heard that nVidia works better for those

Digitalosophy
October 8th, 2003, 05:25 PM
Originally posted by playamarz
Radeon 9700 PRO all the way... :)

blasphemy! lol na, i really hated my radion, maybe yours is better


Nvidia G-Force 128 mg 4200 is the one i have. it's real cheap now, about $150, you just can't go wrong

thoriphes
October 8th, 2003, 07:59 PM
I like nVidia for their common Detonator drivers.
I dislike ATI for their problems with some games.

Mik3
October 8th, 2003, 08:04 PM
Seems like the new game engines seem to run MUCH faster on ATI than nVidia... I mean brand new games like Half-Life2

http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030912/images/image005.gif

thoriphes
October 8th, 2003, 09:22 PM
Originally posted by :mike:
Seems like the new game engines seem to run MUCH faster on ATI than nVidia... I mean brand new games like Half-Life2

http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/20030912/images/image005.gif Yeah, that's because ATI bought rights to bundle HL2 with its cards so Valve is working on optimizing it the most for ATI cards.

Phat7
October 9th, 2003, 01:31 AM
Originally posted by njs12345
^^

That has probably nothing to do with your nVidia card... I mean, it might be, but Flash really only uses your processor... it only uses your graphics card for drawing 2D graphics, which pretty much any card can handle nowadays.

Gut nVidia, gut :nerd:

StylingPaT
October 9th, 2003, 07:39 AM
128MB ATI Radeon 9800 Pro all the way :thumb:

eilsoe
October 9th, 2003, 08:11 AM
well... my Radeon 9600PRO card is arriving today.. so... :sure:


And my old card is an Nvidia Geforce 4 MX440... (crap)



I'm happy! :thumb:

dessoya
October 9th, 2003, 08:46 AM
Originally posted by asphaltcowboy
I do like ATI, perhaps more than nVidia, but recent ATI's haven't had very good cooling systems: they get SO hot :( Another problem is that some companies don't develop for them (e.g. GTA3 doesn't work afaik). That's not their fault though :(

well, i have a 9500pro and every game runs very good... even halflife runs good in both opengl and direct3d mode...
and it doesnt get hot - okay i have an waterchill now ^^ ;)

~:azn:

thoriphes
October 9th, 2003, 10:30 AM
Originally posted by dessoya
well, i have a 9500pro and every game runs very good... even halflife runs good in both opengl and direct3d mode...
and it doesnt get hot - okay i have an waterchill now ^^ ;)

~:azn: you're not talking about half-life 2 are you? :-\