View Full Version : Media Temple + Leopard Server Virtualization
hl
June 17th, 2008, 03:34 PM
http://www.tuaw.com/2008/06/17/media-temple-launches-beta-for-vps-running-on-leopard-server/
Beta sign-up: http://mediatemple.net/labs/xv/apply.html
Interesting move, I'd like to see what happens :)
sekasi
June 17th, 2008, 03:40 PM
Interesting indeed. I have like six sites hosted by MT, two DV ones. Always been curious about this.
Thanks for the post.
Templarian
June 17th, 2008, 04:31 PM
This is really nice. Hope someone here gets in the beta so we can hear about it.
I cannot see this being cheap.
MTsoul
June 17th, 2008, 05:01 PM
How is OS X licensed? Is it like Windows where each runtime instance of it requires a license? That means each virtual Leopard is going to cost a few hundred as basic cost for (mt). And 1/8th of one of these mega 64-bit servers is going to be pretty costly as well. There is no way this thing will be less than $100/month.
What's the point of a Mac OS X server anyway? What does it have that a Linux box does not?
ramie
June 17th, 2008, 06:00 PM
^ If you have a studio full of mac's and are interested in any kind of groupware like calendars, wiki server and directory (think CRM), want a super easy server to administer cos you already have about 6 to look after and don't want to listen to staff *****ing about crappy UI's served to them - it's a pant wetingly tasty proposition. :lol:
hl
June 17th, 2008, 06:21 PM
It brings the enterprise appeal of Windows Server 2003 to OS X.
Anogar
June 17th, 2008, 06:25 PM
pant wettingly tasty
:lol:
Theros
June 18th, 2008, 12:10 AM
It brings the enterprise appeal of Windows Server 2003 to OS X.
So basically, it finally brings those office-space applications to the OSX enviroment. Wow, that took awhile haha. :P
Jeff Wheeler
June 18th, 2008, 02:00 AM
This doesn't appeal to me at all, personally. Really, with an IT guy that any company that can afford this is going to have, I don't see why anybody is going to want this.
But then again, it's OS X and pretty. I hope people know they don't get VNC. :P
hl
June 18th, 2008, 02:15 AM
This doesn't appeal to me at all, personally. Really, with an IT guy that any company that can afford this is going to have, I don't see why anybody is going to want this.
But then again, it's OS X and pretty. I hope people know they don't get VNC. :P
They do get VNC. From the FAQ: "Can I use Screen Sharing and Remote Desktop to manage by [sic] (xv) Server?"
Yes you can use both. Remote Desktop information is available here and you can read some quick Screen Sharing tips here.
fasterthanlight™
June 18th, 2008, 02:16 AM
OHhhhhhh noooooo heeeeeeeeeee DIT'NTTT
Jeff Wheeler
June 18th, 2008, 02:21 AM
Touché.
I guess I now know the advantage, amusing as it may be. :P
hl
June 18th, 2008, 02:56 AM
Indeed. :P
saxx
July 11th, 2008, 06:39 AM
I don't personally find this very interesting, my hosting needs are and probably will be for a while pretty basic
I support author's viewpoint, hoped that will have later also more better articles, wow gold (http://www.wowgoldlive.com) will read the first time, thank!
did this guy just sneak an add into his post? haha
banned now :D
sekasi
July 11th, 2008, 03:48 PM
I didn't get into the test group
:(
Esherido
July 11th, 2008, 07:10 PM
^ You applied? :q: I was thinking about it.
hl
July 13th, 2008, 02:25 PM
Yeah, I didn't make it either. :(
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.