View Full Version : Forcing code execution before moving on
Danneman
July 12th, 2003, 02:33 PM
I am trying to set a couple of _global variables with if-then statement, and just after this, use these _globals in the code.
However, the code moves on before the _globals are properly set.
How can I make the code wait (no timers, please) until the _globals are set?
thoriphes
July 12th, 2003, 02:47 PM
if (_globals != undefined) {
// do yo thang
}
Danneman
July 12th, 2003, 02:55 PM
Thanks for the reply.
However, the globals change regularly and are always defined.
How could I wait for a _global to CHANGE its current value?
I could probably undefine them first, and then define them again, and thus use this code.
But since undefining a _global also takes time, the code could move on before it is undefined and use the old value.
Any ideas?
Danneman
July 12th, 2003, 04:45 PM
Difficult one, huh? What a screwed up problem - Im pretty sure AS is the only programminglanguage that lets the code continue without having set the variables first *LOOOL*
eyezberg
July 12th, 2003, 05:24 PM
did you trace() them to check? shouldn't happen..?
Danneman
July 13th, 2003, 02:34 PM
Yep, *puh* I dont think Ive ever done so much debugging before. Im very close to a nervous breakdown right now :crazy:
-----------------
Process1:
1) I put the _globals to "0" before entering a if-else loop.
2) I redefine _globals in if-else loop.
3) I use _globals new values immediately after the if-else loop is finished (and _globals are defined/redefined) in a function.
Result:
All _globals have value "0".
------------------
------------------
Process 2:
1) I put the _globals to "0" before entering a if-else loop. (same as before)
2) I redefine _globals in if-else loop. (same as before)
3) I need to press a button to call the function (same function as before - only difference is that I wait a while).
Result:
All _globals use correct values.
-------------------
Conclusion:
_globals are not defined properly before code moves on.
Remedy:
Well, with sharedObjects you can use the function "flush" to force the value into the sharedObject immediately.
If there is a similar function for _globals that could solve the problem.
thoriphes
July 13th, 2003, 03:16 PM
Originally posted by Danneman
How could I wait for a _global to CHANGE its current value? just put the global vars into another variable and check to see if it's the same the next time it loops around:
oldglob = _global; //put this right before you have the global variable change
if (_global != oldglob) {
// do yo thang
} else {
// don't do yo thang
}
Danneman
July 15th, 2003, 08:15 PM
Well, what happens then is that the code just passes by without executing. If I put it in a while-sentence (while _global not new value), then the script hangs in an infinite loop.
But I found a workaround to the problem, but since its pretty particular to my code, and is of no real general value, I will not post it.
Thanks for the response, though :)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.