View Full Version : 28 Days Later
replode
June 29th, 2003, 08:57 PM
we were going to go see it today, but the projector was broken, and they were only showing it on 1 freakin screen. anyone here seen it?
reverendflash
June 29th, 2003, 09:01 PM
LOL!
I grew up in a town (we were too small to have a theater), where the town next door only had 1 screen...
you young dux are so spoiled...
:beam:
Revhttp://www.aulman.com/rev.gif
nheet
June 29th, 2003, 09:17 PM
wow. the same thing happened to me today. i went to go see it at the Rave theater and the projector messed up. i had to go see dam Charlies Angles 2. i wanna see some dam zombies. fine women though.
senocular
June 29th, 2003, 09:21 PM
haha sounds like that movie is breaking theaters!
our single theater was called the Daw. I always thought it was the Dull :beam: ... til one day I went there durring the day and actually read the sign lol.
Theres a larger theater in town now though, in the Roses building (which closed when Wally-World came in conqured the town).
:)
nheet
June 29th, 2003, 09:56 PM
I heard the movie is really good and scary. I was really looking foward to seeing it. i'll see it next week end.
kamyab
June 29th, 2003, 10:11 PM
I saw the movie last night. It was pretty good.
senocular
June 29th, 2003, 10:16 PM
just pretty good?
I really havent had much enthusiasm towards seeing it. As of now Id rather watch Charlies Angels given the choice :P
mdipi
June 29th, 2003, 10:24 PM
all i care about right now is BadBoys II
RussianBeer
June 29th, 2003, 10:39 PM
28 days friggin rocked!
Its good because its not hollywood horror, where you can usualy guess when they gona try and scare you...
Very good directing, very good. Acting was good as well. Very cool, and very brutal! I am usualy not a fan of scary movies, but this was good.
I give it **** 1/2 stars!
replode
June 29th, 2003, 11:02 PM
Charlies Angles 2 was decent, but i would have rather seen 28 days later. but Gangs of NY comes out Tue. so i have to buy that.;)
nheet
June 29th, 2003, 11:04 PM
Gangs is my movie.
senocular
June 29th, 2003, 11:04 PM
28 days is Sandra Bullock flic :P
reverendflash
June 29th, 2003, 11:05 PM
I can't get my mind around the title...
sounds like a horror flick about my ex-wife...
:beam:
Revhttp://www.aulman.com/rev.gif
replode
June 29th, 2003, 11:05 PM
actually Gangs is a Martin Scorsese's movie. ;)
nheet
June 29th, 2003, 11:05 PM
28 days later. Zombie movie
RussianBeer
June 29th, 2003, 11:09 PM
28 is not Exacly a zombie movie.. but I gues.. well .. maybe.. sort off.. its good, I recommeded...
nobody
June 29th, 2003, 11:36 PM
i dont want to see a movie.. and im pissed that they wasted such a good number on it
im gonna sue
turkey
June 30th, 2003, 12:40 AM
how do dyou come up with 28 anyways?
nheet
July 1st, 2003, 05:02 PM
Here is the 28 days later web site.
www.28dayslater.com (http://www.28dayslater.com)
Warning: It may be kind of scary. lol
eilsoe
July 1st, 2003, 06:05 PM
you complain about 1 screen at the movies??
Here where I live, we've ALWAYS had just 1 screen, we still do, and it's the friggin best cinema for miles!
If I have to go to multicinemas, I'd have to go to Copenhagen...
tell's ya a little about denmark, eh :sure:
nheet
July 1st, 2003, 07:47 PM
I have more than one screen. There's like 18 screens, 28 Days Later was playing on just one screen. Usually new movies come on like two or three screens.
nheet
July 1st, 2003, 09:55 PM
This must be a good movie. Most of the time these scary movies get bad reviews from critics. but this ones getting good reviews. Ive read three articles on it and two gave it a B+ and the other gave it an A. I'm ready to see this. I hope it scares the dump out of me.
SureShot
July 2nd, 2003, 11:55 AM
If you havent seen this movie and you like scary movies at all - go see this. It's fantastic and scary as hell! The camera work is unbelievable and the music - wow.
There are parts in the movie with no sound what so ever for like 2 min and in a theatre of like 300 people, not one person made a peep - that's a powerful film. Like I said - if you are even a slight fan of the genre, go see it and bring a friend - you'll need it ;)
fester8542
July 2nd, 2003, 12:58 PM
Originally posted by eilsoe
you complain about 1 screen at the movies??
Here where I live, we've ALWAYS had just 1 screen, we still do, and it's the friggin best cinema for miles!
If I have to go to multicinemas, I'd have to go to Copenhagen...
tell's ya a little about denmark, eh :sure:
Sorry folks. The smallest thearter around me probably has 20 screens. I am spoiled.
replode
July 2nd, 2003, 01:00 PM
yes, me too. we have like 4 theaters just in our city, but usually we only go to one.
andr.in
July 2nd, 2003, 01:13 PM
I don't like it! It wasn't scary at all! It was like a bad action movie or something! Oh and I just saw the thin red line and I think that was even worse! I didn't even understand half of the film... pointless war! Oh and I didn't even watch the end of it! I was so disappointed!
Originally posted by eilsoe
you complain about 1 screen at the movies??
Here where I live, we've ALWAYS had just 1 screen, we still do, and it's the friggin best cinema for miles!
If I have to go to multicinemas, I'd have to go to Copenhagen...
tell's ya a little about denmark, eh :sure:
same here! ( I'm not sure if the screen we have ven works anymore!...
nheet
July 6th, 2003, 05:06 PM
I just saw it today. Good movie. Nice camera work and good story. It didn't scare me, but i liked it anyways. Acually the part that scared me was a part when a car alarm went off. Made me jump.
Jubba
July 6th, 2003, 10:53 PM
the concept is creepy and the twist is creepier. Definately a well done movie :) :thumb:
replode
July 6th, 2003, 10:57 PM
the shots with the digital camera were mixed in really nicely with the rest of the movie, and the makers didn't over-do it at all. i give the movie somewhere between a B+ and an A. definatily one of the better horror movies recently. i hope the director does another film.=)
andr.in
July 7th, 2003, 04:21 AM
Acually the part that scared me was a part when a car alarm went off. exactly the same here!
senocular
July 7th, 2003, 05:30 AM
yeah the car alarm was definitely the most scrary part. The only other scary parts involved an infected surprisingly coming through a window.
I cant say I left with too good an impression though. Nothing about the film really impressed me too much :-\ Not that it was bad, just nothing to be excited over (IMHO).
... I also saw the ring for the first time over the weekend. That was actually better than I thought it was going to be (I liked it more than 28 days later). It wasnt scary but it was thoughtful and had a decent ending (If it had ended with them sitting on the well there near the end I wouldnt have thought too much about it).
Kajinku
July 7th, 2003, 07:06 AM
AAAH!! NOOOO!! HARRGHH!!! AARRGRRRGHHRG!! NOOOO!!
It's a Zombie movie. If you like Zombies, you will like 28 Days Later.
andr.in
July 7th, 2003, 11:43 AM
zombies couldn't possibly move that fast!
replode
July 7th, 2003, 12:57 PM
The Ring was pretty good, but i liked 28 Days later a lot too. it wasnt really a zombie movie, and it didnt copy off of Resident Evil. the story like was good too, something different. once again, the digital camera work was awsome!:)
Kajinku
July 7th, 2003, 02:20 PM
I agree on this one, it's very well filmed... I mean, it does its work and all, I liked that too. But it *is* a Zombie movie. Not Hollywood-ish, but still Zombie. Ish.
nheet
July 7th, 2003, 10:57 PM
It was what Resident Evil wanted to be. I call them zombies but I don't know if you would classify them as zombies. They're not dead. Good movie though. Had the right amount of monster movie and suspenceful thriller in it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.