login thingy

[vintage]

On irc I heard people talk about the annoying fact that if people register on a forum, they have to fill in all kind of information and when they push "Submit", they see a new screen "pls go back and fill in blah blah".

This was the idea for me to create a register form and "realtime" check if the nickname allready was taken, or if bliblabloo@adreess.com allready was in use OR was invalid, if the confirm password was wrong.
For fun I even made a "password integrety checker".

My graphic skills are way beyond bad and my script skillz are just after noob level, but all works as I wanted.
pls check my register form :)

a list with allready rigistered people (http://www.vintagesworld.be/register/geregistreerd.php) so you cant take these names (if I did all right :p)
and the form (http://www.vintagesworld.be/register), I did build in a shared object to prevent multiple accounts (so for noobs it will be difficult to make more accounts) but here all know how to delete shared objects :) (pls dont tell anyone ^^)

if you try to look at my code : DONT, it still bad, im trying to learn some basic "strict scripting" in my holliday, for now the script suk bottom ^^

thx for reading and maybe register (even if their is nothing to see) :)

[unclesond]

I signed up, now can't check the whole idea of it works :(

[vintage]

then you have to delete the shared object :P


ok, dont do it youreself, here it will be done for you :)

http://www.vintagesworld.be/register/clearCookske.swf <= visit and you can register agian :P (with another name and email)

[Krilnon]

Interesting email checking script… it even supports less-common TLDs like .arpa and .museum. Did you make that part of it?

[vintage]

@ Krilnon: yes i did.

[hybrid101]

pretty cool email checker;)
lol, shared objects could be deleted easily;)

[Esherido]

Nice little Flash, the pass integrity checker might need a bit of work (I put in a great password and it said it was like 4/10. Love your e-mail checker.

[evildrummer]

I like it.

[vintage]

@Esherido:

The password integrety is pretty okay I think, maybe your pass isnt :run: ?

It looks if you got caps and small characters in the pss
and if its not only numbers
and if its not only letters
and if its not containing big parts your "registered" name
and if its not containing big parts of your email adress
and if there are not to much "the same" characters in line
and length
and if you use ! or ( or ) or ? or @

but if you suggest more things to check pls let me know :)

[Esherido]

You might want to make it to check how many letters and number and special chars it has in it. Sum: maybe make it so that it checks not only if they don't have something, check if they are using many different things (letters, numbers !, (, ), ?, @, and so on)

[vintage]

Well thats what it does,
it looks if you use special chars, if you do it add points
if you use caps and normal mixed, it add points
if you use numbers, it adds points
the longer the pass, the more points


if you have to many same characters after eachother it substract points (aaaaaapSdab)
if you have to much of your email in the pass word, it substract points (same with the name)
if you use only numbers, it substract points.

the best you can do is not use name or email in the pass, use numbers, caps and normal characters togetter and add a special char :)


ps with my "check" you cant reach 100% but there is no such thing as 100% safe :)

[Sliker_Hawk]

I've seen this sort of thing on vBulletin before. It changes crosses to ticks depending on a fields validity, like this. Don't think it's got the e-mail validator though, it just uses normal e-mail activation.
I've seen something in HTML with a password integrity checker (to steal your name), too.

But still, good script.

[Esherido]

Ok, really nice pass integrity thing. I guess it's just not used to my style of passwords. They're just a secure, just very, very different. I also like ur feature that lets u know the already registered users. Again, great (and amazing) job vintage! ;)

[vintage]

ok, I just redid the integrity check, maybe its better now.
I husselt a bit with the numbers you get, maybe its more fair now.