View Full Version : PS3 Price revealed
grimdeath
May 9th, 2006, 09:31 AM
View prices for your region here
http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/top/e306-playstation-3-pricing-info-172383.php#more
Lets see whow this plays out, we still gotta wait for the Wii Price oh another funny thing is sony is using PS2 wireless controllers for the PS3 that is kinda cheap of them.
Edit:
Apparently the 500 version doesnt have HDMI and no wifi built in, so in other words it renders your blu-ray Hi Def experience since it will downsample the video to 420 and it doesnt support 1080.
This doesnt seem right since you cant really upgrade the cheap version in order to make it compatible with the premium version unlike with the x360 I wonder why they just didnt do a hd version and one without the hd and sell it for cheaper a la x360 because what they did is ridiculous.
Oh another thing the controller now doesnt rumble but it has some tilt motion sensor technology, and the games they showed on the florr looked no where near that killzone CG trailer.
Looks bad for Sony IMHO.
senocular
May 9th, 2006, 10:49 AM
Makes you wonder when they decided to do the motion sensor thing, before or after the boomerang (before or after revolution?)
nrirureta
May 9th, 2006, 11:02 AM
Looks bad for Sony IMHO.
well it looked bad from day 1... :(
DevDreamer
May 9th, 2006, 12:02 PM
Looks bad for Sony IMHO.
People will still buy it. I know some friends from work who already have the money and then some to buy it. People have known that the price would be outstanding for a while now so this shouldn't come as a shock to anyone.
Doesn't anyone remember when the X-Box first came out? Everyone said it was going to fail. Now look at it, it's one of the most played systems out there. We'll just have to wait till November 17th (or later) to see how it plays out. I know I'll be picking up one of these along with the Wii and I'm going to wait till the 360 has a game that actually interests me that hasn't come out for the PC as well.
All in all, I think Sony will do alright in this run.
DDD
May 9th, 2006, 12:19 PM
I know I will still be buying it. Maybe not as a mad rush like I did Xbox tho. I gotta see some launch game titles first. If Xbox drops some good games around that time then I dont think I will get a PS3 on launch date. Oh well we will see. Blu Ray, Green Ray, HDMI, O.P.P....all the same to me. Long as the games kick arse and the graphics are on point, Im in.
DevDreamer
May 9th, 2006, 01:01 PM
I know I will still be buying it. Maybe not as a mad rush like I did Xbox tho. I gotta see some launch game titles first. If Xbox drops some good games around that time then I dont think I will get a PS3 on launch date. Oh well we will see. Blu Ray, Green Ray, HDMI, O.P.P....all the same to me. Long as the games kick arse and the graphics are on point, Im in.
Well... Halo 3 will be launched on the day PS3 is launched... so theres a factor in that :D
haam
May 9th, 2006, 01:25 PM
wow. 5 to 6 hundred dollars for a gaming console. what do they think they are offering people? you can buy a dell and do so much more with it for less than that.
retarded.
wizard
May 9th, 2006, 01:44 PM
http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/8130/black4kd.th.jpg (http://img164.imageshack.us/my.php?image=black4kd.jpg)
Man, that guide button sure looks familiar :h:
What's that you say? They also put tilt-sensors in it?
And look, only four player action instead of the seven (eight with PSP) they talked about last year.
And where was Killzone?
Some differences. And it has gotten bigger - maybe to avoid the "power brick" the 360 sports?
http://img333.imageshack.us/img333/3143/ps2point52xw7qa.jpg
Okay now, despite all that (and many more things), I'll still end up buying a PS3 for a game called Gran Turismo - it just wont happen as soon as I thought it would.
ramie
May 9th, 2006, 02:57 PM
hmmmm, at that price i'll buy 2 just incase my drool breaks one
tpspoons
May 9th, 2006, 03:12 PM
how much do u think itl cost in £? Although im wii all the way :) <-- the ps3 is way above my budget.... although it does look cool
love police
May 9th, 2006, 08:05 PM
E3 has been handed onto plate for nintendo :D
3d Nirvana
May 9th, 2006, 09:28 PM
i think it sounds bad for sony also. With that big of a price i doubt many people will buy it.... and the graphics arnt going to be any better than the 360's really.
idk, maybe they would have done all right if they launched with the other systems.... but with Nintendo launching soon.... and 360 already out.... it doesnt look good.
Theros
May 9th, 2006, 10:40 PM
Ha, the americans beat the japanese at their own game! Go Microsoft! :P
eilsoe
May 10th, 2006, 02:45 AM
Personally, I'm not thrown off that much about all this. The price in DKK are just around the 5000 I expected, so that's not a shocker to me. And I'm really glad they opted for the new controller, seeing as I love the old one :)
And the key factor in why I'm getting a PS3 is still, that I've got around 30+ games for my ps2 I'd like to work on PS3 also, then chuck out the PS2. I'm not all for having several consoles standing around. So when I buy it, I'll have some games to play while robbing banks to get some PS3 games...
(and yes, I'm aware that I could just wait for the PS3 and play my old games on the PS2, but I wanna roll them through the new console and play in higher res, but that's just me...)
grimdeath
May 10th, 2006, 09:52 AM
Mark my words on PS3 launch day you can buy a X360 and a Wii for the price of 1 PS3 premium.
If Nintendo really wants to take advantadge over their new features and try to dominate the market they once ruled they gotta sell the Wii for 200 bucks heck at that price point I might even consider purchasing one.
senocular
May 10th, 2006, 10:58 AM
I seriously doubt the Wii will be more than $200. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if it was somewhere around $189 or even as low as $150 depending on how much less they think they need to go (or how low MS is able to get a 360 down to by then).
As for PS3, I think they have some good price points. Thats about what Id expect, especially given the technology in there and people (not including myself) will pay it. I'm not sure how many people will opt for the lesser of the two models, though.
wizard
May 11th, 2006, 02:57 AM
Since the cheaper one doesn't output HDMI that makes your BluRay drive useless... as far as movies go. A strange move...
danulf
May 11th, 2006, 03:58 AM
aww, in europe they just changed the dollar-sign to a euro-sign... So it's more expensive here...
LunaSolar
May 11th, 2006, 12:29 PM
PS3 is way more than I would ever pay for something like that. Sorry, $600 is WAY too much.
Plus it looks worse graphically than the 360 which I already have.
wizard
May 11th, 2006, 01:12 PM
Plus it looks worse graphically than the 360 which I already have.You mean to tell me a system that is six months off looks worse than a system thats been out six months? Like no way!!! :beam:
And actually, the games didn't look all that bad - I'm just having a problem with the hardware, and how it comes in two sku's after they said they probably wouldn't go that way --> http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=11209 :beam:
3d Nirvana
May 11th, 2006, 08:27 PM
i was looking at some of the ps3 games.... and they do really look bad (comparing them to the LAUNCH 360 games).
The lack of ant aliasing capabilities really seem to hurt it... instead of having nice trees and things they have jagged scary edges everywhere..... Furthermore, the ps3 lacks all the post enhancements that the 360's graphic chip can do (because they have more graphics memory and less system memory... while the ps3 has more system memory and less graphics.... but they both add to 500mb). For example, the 360 can do motion blurring, depth of field, and glow all easily while it looks like none of the ps3 games can.
While comparing pgr3 on the 360 to Gran Turismo (assuming that's their big racing game for launch), Gran Turismo looks horrible.
http://www.geekytalk.com/uploads/pgr.jpg
(ps3 on top, 360 on bottom)
Clearly the motion blur and post that the 360 can do really makes the game feel more like you're going fast.
Just my 2cents
flashdick
May 11th, 2006, 10:23 PM
Mark my words on PS3 launch day you can buy a X360 and a Wii for the price of 1 PS3 premium.
If Nintendo really wants to take advantadge over their new features and try to dominate the market they once ruled they gotta sell the Wii for 200 bucks heck at that price point I might even consider purchasing one.
y would i opt for 2 dumb consoles when i can get a ps3 ?
CriTiCeRz
May 11th, 2006, 11:02 PM
Here we go... I found a clip that's pretty sad... lol.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=c_4InHXPHvs&feature=Views&page=1&t=t&f=b
Templarian
May 11th, 2006, 11:05 PM
Thats pretty bad there lol^
CriTiCeRz
May 11th, 2006, 11:22 PM
I feel kind of bad for them now... lol. Should be kind of embarassing.
wizard
May 11th, 2006, 11:36 PM
y would i opt for 2 dumb consoles when i can get a ps3 ?What makes them dumb?
i was looking at some of the ps3 games.... and they do really look bad (comparing them to the LAUNCH 360 games).
The lack of ant aliasing capabilities really seem to hurt it... instead of having nice trees and things they have jagged scary edges everywhere..... Furthermore, the ps3 lacks all the post enhancements that the 360's graphic chip can do (because they have more graphics memory and less system memory... while the ps3 has more system memory and less graphics.... but they both add to 500mb). For example, the 360 can do motion blurring, depth of field, and glow all easily while it looks like none of the ps3 games can.
While comparing pgr3 on the 360 to Gran Turismo (assuming that's their big racing game for launch), Gran Turismo looks horrible.
Clearly the motion blur and post that the 360 can do really makes the game feel more like you're going fast.
Just my 2centsYeah, Gran Turismo HD (is what they're calling it) did look like Gran Turismo 3 - but that's not coming out 'till next year at the earliest. I hope it looks better. :worried:
And we have to remember that one year ago Xbox 360's games didn't look all that great, either. They're still a ways off.
danulf
May 12th, 2006, 05:43 AM
i was looking at some of the ps3 games.... and they do really look bad (comparing them to the LAUNCH 360 games).
The lack of ant aliasing capabilities really seem to hurt it... instead of having nice trees and things they have jagged scary edges everywhere..... Furthermore, the ps3 lacks all the post enhancements that the 360's graphic chip can do (because they have more graphics memory and less system memory... while the ps3 has more system memory and less graphics.... but they both add to 500mb). For example, the 360 can do motion blurring, depth of field, and glow all easily while it looks like none of the ps3 games can.
While comparing pgr3 on the 360 to Gran Turismo (assuming that's their big racing game for launch), Gran Turismo looks horrible.
http://www.geekytalk.com/uploads/pgr.jpg
(ps3 on top, 360 on bottom)
Clearly the motion blur and post that the 360 can do really makes the game feel more like you're going fast.
Just my 2cents
wow, that IS bad! But FFXIII looked so nice! They still have time to make some modifications to it, don't they?
3d Nirvana
May 12th, 2006, 09:57 AM
And we have to remember that one year ago Xbox 360's games didn't look all that great, either. They're still a ways off.
but that 360 screen waaass from like a year ago.... it was a screen of pgr which was a lunch title... and the screenshot was posted 10/04/2005 :)
grimdeath
May 12th, 2006, 10:21 AM
y would i opt for 2 dumb consoles when i can get a ps3 ?
The only dumb console Im seeing as of now is PS3 the design and controllers are identical to the PS2 they just made it bigger and half a circle instead of squared, lack of innovation and creativity.
X360 has live and a few good games but by years end that will change we should have Gears of War, Too Human, Mass Effect to name a few.
Nintendo has its popular franchises, Mario, Zelda, Metroid, Kid Icarus plus on top of that its cheaper and has a unique controller, many people will buy a Wii out of curiosity and try out the controller.
Sony has God of War, Shadow Colossus, Final Fantasy, Metal Gear and Gran Turismo. Of these I only like 3and one of them is gonna be for PS2 not PS3 which is God of War 2.
All sony is doing is imitating both of Nintendo and MS ideas and adopting them lets see how that plays out.
And anyone knows 2 is better than 1 :lol: only someone who doesnt know about math thinks 1 is greater than 2.
Nintendo lost its dominance a few genarations ago but I actually think they can surprise alot of us and get back in the game if they do things right, that doesnt mean Sony cant loose its dominance of the game market.
We can only wait and see but it looks bad for Sony so far.
nrirureta
May 12th, 2006, 10:34 AM
Here we go... I found a clip that's pretty sad... lol.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=c_4InHXPHvs&feature=Views&page=1&t=t&f=b
LOL :D ....
anyone read this comment under the video :
- maybe it was a picture in a nice frame....
:D
grimdeath
May 12th, 2006, 10:40 AM
Another thing I find strange is that Rare is working with Nintendo again theyre gonna make diddy kong racing for the DS, but Rare is property of MS now WTF could MS and Nintendo team up in the future?
Interesting.
nrirureta
May 12th, 2006, 11:14 AM
Another thing I find strange is that Rare is working with Nintendo again theyre gonna make diddy kong racing for the DS, but Rare is property of MS now WTF could MS and Nintendo team up in the future?
Interesting.
i hope not... that would be a final killer blow for sony... i better see Sony and Nintendo team up and destroy MS...
:ko:
Solidus
May 12th, 2006, 11:34 AM
Man this e3 is crazy I had no idea Sony was going to make such a *** of themselves presenting. But regardless of how stupid Sony is they have still made a pretty amazing console. The games on it do look unreal some look as good as xbox360 games some look quite a bit better:
Man its good to be a gamer!
http://www.globalstudio.com/clients/ps3index.htm
The following are games that are only on ps3 and all these screenshots are in fact in-game. No pre-rendered movies(ala killzone 2). If you click on any of the actual images it will take you to the high-res movies for each game. I strongly suggest you check out MGS4(OMG!!!) FINAL FANTASY(HOLY KRISPY KREME CHRIST!!!) RESISTANCE(DAMN!) and WARHAWK(VERY SWEET! AND IT USES THE PS3's 6 Axis controller really well)
Of These games Resistance, and Warkhawk are the only launch titles. Pretty big difference between these games and the ones my 360 launch with.
360 Is looking really fricken good this year too I strongly suggest you check out Gears of War it look great.
OH and Halo 3 does not launch anywhere near the time ps3 comes out that rumor has been defunct for a while. Check your sources.
And the WEE aside from just so so graphics looks like a absolute blast to play. Im definitely buying one since my wife actually showed some interest in Mario. And by interest I mean she looked at the computer and said "Ahhh Mario is so cute" So based on that statement maybe I can get her into games. Then she wont kill me when she realizes how much i spent on PS3 and that i traded her grandmother for a few games...Sheesh.
simplistik
May 12th, 2006, 11:34 AM
Here we go... I found a clip that's pretty sad... lol.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=c_4InHXPHvs&feature=Views&page=1&t=t&f=b
Not as sad as releasing a product on the market, who's CPU fries shortly after people aquire them... ;) just saying.
Real nice link Solidus :D
Solidus
May 12th, 2006, 11:35 AM
touche' Simp check out the link i posted pretty bad *** man you got to get one so i can own you guys at Warhawk. :D
simplistik
May 12th, 2006, 11:46 AM
touche' Simp check out the link i posted pretty bad *** man you got to get one so i can own you guys at Warhawk. :D
:lol: That FF trailer made me soil myself :D Being a huge FF fan and all. Like I said if FF is as good as it's made out to be I'll be droppin the bones for the system :D, and then stop freelancing for about a month or so :lol:
Solidus
May 12th, 2006, 11:57 AM
haha my thoughts exactly
nrirureta
May 12th, 2006, 12:30 PM
Then she wont kill me when she realizes how much i spent on PS3 and that i traded her grandmother for a few games...Sheesh.
lol... that's one cheap grandmother... :)
^ some of the above images are unbelievable...
wizard
May 12th, 2006, 12:35 PM
Then she wont kill me when she realizes how much i spent on PS3 and that i traded her grandmother for a few games...Sheesh.:ko: http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/6411/snakesig6by.gif (http://imageshack.us)
Solidus
May 12th, 2006, 12:40 PM
Im so amped over this resistance game looks like call of duty mixed with half life 2 pretty bad *** idea:
http://www.us.playstation.com/Content/OGS/GMID-018/Site/
grimdeath
May 12th, 2006, 04:03 PM
If you guys think Sony doesnt have problems just check out this E3 video.
http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/top/e306-clips-e3-morning-stampede-173469.php
nrirureta
May 12th, 2006, 04:17 PM
If you guys think Sony doesnt have problems just check out this E3 video.
http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/top/e306-clips-e3-morning-stampede-173469.php
OMG...thats hilarious...i liked how the sony guys were watching the crowd in frustration...i didnt think it was that bad...i feel sorry for sony...i kind of liked them...:sure:
DDD
May 12th, 2006, 04:31 PM
now that is pretty funny.
LunaSolar
May 12th, 2006, 05:07 PM
OWNED!
This is why Microsoft got their booth in a whole different hall, because this is embarrassing.
Solidus
May 12th, 2006, 05:14 PM
HAHAHA man i would be checking out the Wii too if i was there you just dont try and front Shigeru
indiasfinest
May 12th, 2006, 11:52 PM
that is insane, 600 bucks? maybe xbox will drop the price, i will just go 2 one of my retard friends' house and play it if i am that desperate. if not, the saved money will be used for a laptop :)
GWB
May 13th, 2006, 09:25 AM
It will not be $600. I come from the UK, and the selling price is said to be around £350. That's about $430 to you Americans.
wizard
May 13th, 2006, 12:44 PM
It will not be $600. I come from the UK, and the selling price is said to be around £350. That's about $430 to you Americans.Didn't Sony confirm $600 USD?
wizard
May 13th, 2006, 01:47 PM
Assassins: Creed running on Xbox 360
What's wrong with that? Well you see Assassins Creed is a PS3 game and was shown at the PS3 booth.
A link to the article (which is useless since the article has been taken down :pa: ): http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/708/708431p1.html
Some people did catch it though, here's what it said:
E3 2006: Xbox 360 Assassinated
Ubisoft Montreal's Prince of Persia influenced action game may come to Xbox 360.
by Douglass C. Perry
May 12, 2006 - Ubisoft Montreal revealed its next incredible project, Assassins: Creed, exclusively for PlayStation 3 at E3 this year, much to the delight of Sony console fans and to the dismay of Microsoft consoles fans.
A third-person action game in the vein of Prince of Persia, Ubisoft Montreal's newest title shows off the next generation with fantastic texture work, early but promising animations, and newly envisioned levels of Prince/Spider-Men climbing/traversing. But the game, officially, is strictly exclusive to PlayStation 3. Ubisoft officially would not comment on a possible Xbox 360 version.
According to sources close to the company, however, there are potential plans for an Xbox 360 version at Assassins: Creed sometime in 2007. Additionally, Microsoft sources who asked not to be mentioned by name, claimed the demo, hidden behind closed doors at E3, was running on an Xbox 360 using a third-party USB PlayStation controller. The game system was hidden in a stand covered by a sheet. Again, Ubisoft officials would not comment.
We'll have more soon.
http://img479.imageshack.us/img479/2116/93002220060511screen0011un.th.jpg (http://img479.imageshack.us/my.php?image=93002220060511screen0011un.jpg)
:pirate3:
If this is true. :lol:
3d Nirvana
May 14th, 2006, 12:57 AM
omg that is clasic :lol: :lol:
Solidus
May 14th, 2006, 07:05 PM
ASSASINS CREED - Is only on PS3 at this point. Conversion would be tough since its been built from the ground up for PS3 and doesnt use any middleware that would make porting easy. So its very unlikely its just a "timed exclusive" It is probably going to be a "console exclusive" to PS3.
simplistik
May 15th, 2006, 10:00 AM
Assassins: Creed running on Xbox 360
What's wrong with that? Well you see Assassins Creed is a PS3 game and was shown at the PS3 booth.
A link to the article (which is useless since the article has been taken down :pa: ): http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/708/708431p1.html
Some people did catch it though, here's what it said:
http://img479.imageshack.us/img479/2116/93002220060511screen0011un.th.jpg (http://img479.imageshack.us/my.php?image=93002220060511screen0011un.jpg)
:pirate3:
If this is true. :lol:
If you believe something like this, w/o proof, you may as well believe, that I'm actually Kirupa, I mean... why else was I never banned ;). OF course someone would try to discredit Sony by saying something like that... and the fact that the source came from a m$ employee... come on give me a break. If I said I made one million dollars in the last minute... who are you to say I didn't.
wizard
May 15th, 2006, 11:30 AM
If you believe something like this, w/o proof, you may as well believe, that I'm actually Kirupa, I mean... why else was I never banned ;). OF course someone would try to discredit Sony by saying something like that... and the fact that the source came from a m$ employee... come on give me a break. If I said I made one million dollars in the last minute... who are you to say I didn't.The article was taken down and Ubisoft never denied it - if it weren't true, they could've at least done that.
Plus, again, it's Ubisoft which means they're probably already working on a 360 version. They're smart enough to know exclusive titles aren't a smart move. You're right, no proof - but it's certainly possible... and it is Sony afterall.
Mik3
May 15th, 2006, 12:00 PM
Sure you can make the X360 core into the more expensive model but that doesn't mean you can compare that to the PS3 for the reason that the X360, even upgraded, doesn't have the same HD output as the PS3. Not to mention that even the less expensive PS3 has a next generation media input where as neither of the X360's have one. In addition to this, the core X360 doesn't even have a hard drive at all.
I found someone else who said something like I did: "A 360 with hard drive is $400; tack on another $100 for the wireless adapter. Gets you into the $500 range of the base PS3 that has a the same size hard drive and built-in wifi. Except the PS3's going to be doing Blu-Ray right out of the box, no? Compare to the 360's HD-DVD attachment, which'll run at least $100. All in all, I think $500's a fair deal for launch."
simplistik
May 15th, 2006, 01:03 PM
but it's certainly possible... and it is Sony afterall.
?eh... you lost me there chief... has this happened before? And if you want to talk about credability... lets talk about Windows Vista, m$ and their "originality" so it's not like ALL companies are angels ;). And there must be a reason that the article was removed ;)... it could be that it was a false claim. Or of course Sony could've paid off the source :lol:
wizard
May 15th, 2006, 01:57 PM
?eh... you lost me there chief... has this happened before?Not exactly like this, but Sony has been known to exaggerate or flat out lie... but you're right, and all companies do this. I just think it'd be funny if it really was running on a 360.
And yes we could talk about MS - and how all their demos (last year) were running on Apple G5's. :crazy:
LunaSolar
May 15th, 2006, 02:52 PM
Ubisoft rarely does exclusives. Think Splinter Cell, that started a an Xbox Exclusive, and Ubisoft kept saying that there were no plans to "downport" it for the PS2.
Ubisoft kept saying that due to the lighting engine that the PS2 would have trouble running Splinter Cell.
Less than 1 year after the Xbox one was released, it was out on PS2.
That is just the way Ubisoft works for some strange reason. On occasion they will do different "versions" of a game for different consoles, but Solid exclusives just isn't their game.
wizard
September 3rd, 2006, 02:45 PM
Ubisoft rarely does exclusives.You're right: Link (http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=19408)
Yeah I bumped this! :wt:
LunaSolar
September 4th, 2006, 12:44 PM
If you believe something like this, w/o proof, you may as well believe, that I'm actually Kirupa, I mean... why else was I never banned ;). OF course someone would try to discredit Sony by saying something like that... and the fact that the source came from a m$ employee... come on give me a break. If I said I made one million dollars in the last minute... who are you to say I didn't.\
Anything you want to say now that this game has been confirmed for the 360?
Ohls
September 4th, 2006, 04:22 PM
i was looking at some of the ps3 games.... and they do really look bad (comparing them to the LAUNCH 360 games).
The lack of ant aliasing capabilities really seem to hurt it... instead of having nice trees and things they have jagged scary edges everywhere..... Furthermore, the ps3 lacks all the post enhancements that the 360's graphic chip can do (because they have more graphics memory and less system memory... while the ps3 has more system memory and less graphics.... but they both add to 500mb). For example, the 360 can do motion blurring, depth of field, and glow all easily while it looks like none of the ps3 games can.
While comparing pgr3 on the 360 to Gran Turismo (assuming that's their big racing game for launch), Gran Turismo looks horrible.
http://www.geekytalk.com/uploads/pgr.jpg
(ps3 on top, 360 on bottom)
Clearly the motion blur and post that the 360 can do really makes the game feel more like you're going fast.
Just my 2cents
thats just a bad picture of the GT game and a good one of PGR3.
Heres a good one of GT:HD:
http://www.joystiq.com/media/2006/05/DSC_2125.JPG (I know its a screener but you can clearly see a blur effect)
And a good one of the F1 game for PS3:
http://www.maxps3.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/ps31f12006.jpg
And then two bad ones one PGR3:
http://www.axbserver.de/axb/uploads/mediapool/Specials/X05/PGR3.jpg
Notice the headlight
http://www.shacknews.com/extras/gotham1.bmp
Look at the edges of the windows. It's not only the PS3 who has "jagged scary edges everywhere"
grimdeath
September 6th, 2006, 10:28 AM
Sure you can make the X360 core into the more expensive model but that doesn't mean you can compare that to the PS3 for the reason that the X360, even upgraded, doesn't have the same HD output as the PS3.
Your gonna have to pay extra for HD on the PS3 mikey since the PS3 doesn't include the HDMI cable out of the box at least the X360 brings the component/composite cables so you can have HD gaming out of the box.
More info here
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6157113.html?tag=lastword;link
Strength
September 7th, 2006, 12:46 PM
You seem to have a bit of a bias against the PS3...
The system hasn't even been released yet for God's sake.
PS2= A huge fan base and a wide variety of good games and developers.
Xbox= Halo and FPS. Better graphics and rendering. Built in hardrive and Xbox Live support.
Sony is reaching every issue raised against its last gen system, and they deserve some credit for that.
I still think the Blue-ray support is important.. Yes, it's more than anyone would need for the most part, but as the systems grow older I think that boundery (space wise) for HDDVD's could be breached.
Eh, time will tell.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.